Principle of community of evidence in its non-criminal procedural phases, Colombia - Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2361Keywords:
Comparative law, justice, constitution. (UNESCO Thesaurus).Abstract
The general objective of this research was to legally analyze the principle of community of evidence in its non-criminal procedural phases, Colombia - Ecuador. It was developed from a quantitative approach; under a documentary-bibliographic research. A review of the national and international legislation applicable to the subject, as well as books, theses and relevant articles and Ecuadorian justice documents was carried out. These sources were critically analyzed, describing the findings. It is also supported by a survey of 100 lawyers in free practice. It is concluded that, with respect to the need to study and evaluate the principle of community of evidence, it can be affirmed that the basis of the same contemplates that everything that supports or forms part of the file, does not belong to the party that has consigned it, nor to any of these but to the process, enters into the procedural act is considered.
Downloads
References
Arreaga, M. (2021). Procedimiento probatorio; judicial, proceso; defensa, derecho a la; prueba. [Evidentiary procedure; judicial; process; defense; right to; evidence]. Tesis de Maestria. Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/dzji7
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia
Asamblea Nacional de la República del Ecuador. (2015) Código orgánico general de procesos. [General Organic Code of Processes]. 2 - Suplemento - Registro Oficial Nº 506 - viernes 22 de mayo de 2015. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/z8haz
Barrios, B. (2003). Teoría de la sana critica. [Theory of sound criticism]. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/ubk39
Echandía, H. (2000). Compendio de la Prueba Judicial. [Compendium of Judicial Evidence ].(Vol. Tomo I). Rubinzal/Culzoni Editores.
Esperanza, S. (2015). Sana Crítia: Visión de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación Argentina. [Sana Crítia: Vision of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Argentine Nation]. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/kmy9b
Gomes, J., & Magalhães, M. (2018). Metodología del derecho comparado en derechos humanos. [Methodology of comparative law on human rights]. Universidad Portucalense. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/fv81b
Illesca, I. (2016). Elementos constitucionales Relacionados con la prueba en el Proceso civil. [Constitutional Elements Related to Evidence in Civil Proceedings]. Tesis de Maestría.Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/qoces
Segovia, N. (2020). Límites de la libertad probatoria en el sistema mixto concentrado de audiencias previsto en el COGEP. [Limits to the freedom of evidence in the concentrated mixed system of hearings under COGEP]. Tesis de Maestria. Universidad Internaiconal SEK. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/apcvo
Sotomarino, R. (2018). Apuntes introductorios al derecho comparado. [Introductory notes on comparative law]. THEMIS Revista de Derecho, (73), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201801.014
Velepucha, M. (2016). La oportunidad de la prueba. [Timeliness of the test]. Consejo de la Judicatura Ecuador. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/k2eix
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
