The principle of opportunity and its procedural antinomy in relation to the natural penalty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2362Keywords:
Constitutional law, application of the law, legislation. (UNESCO Thesaurus).Abstract
The general objective of this research was to legally analyze the principle of opportunity and its procedural antinomy in relation to the natural penalty. It was developed from the quantitative paradigm, framed from a documentary-bibliographic design, through the inquiry, collection and critical documentary analysis and bibliographic reference, based on the methodical, rigorous and deep exploration of various sources such as scientific research, articles and refereed works, laws, among others. Describing the findings found, allowing the development of the theoretical body in relation to the subject of study. In addition, a questionnaire was applied. It is concluded that the punishment received by the perpetrator of the traffic event for the mere harmful result should be observed in relation to the transgression of rights caused to other people, since in this way there would be a balance between the suffering of the active subject, the non-existence of a criminal process, the non-appearance of a deprivation of liberty.
Downloads
References
Arias, F. (2012). El Proyecto de Investigación. Introducción a la metodología científica. [The Research Project. Introduction to scientific methodology]. Caracas. Venezuela. 5ª Edición. Editorial Episteme.
Asamblea Constituyente. (2009). Código Orgánico de la Función Judicial. [Organic Code of the Judicial Function]. Ley 0 Registro Oficial Suplemento 544 de 09-mar.-2009 Ultima modificación: 22-may.-2015 Estado: Vigente. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/wm4o
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia
Asamblea Nacional de la República del Ecuador. (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal [Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code]. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/g6sc
Ferrajoli, L. (2010). Democracia y garantismo. [Democracy and guarantees]. Madrid: Trotta.
Gallardo Rosado, M. (2013). El principio de oportunidad en la reforma procesal penal. [The principle of opportunity in the criminal procedure reform]. Mèxico D.F. Universidad Nacional Autònoma de Mèxico.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/wfra1
López Yagües, V. (2020). Principio de oportunidad y enjuiciamiento de los delitos leves. En S. y. Calaza, Postmodernidad y proceso europeo: la oportunidad como principio informador del proceso judicial. [Principle of opportunity and prosecution of minor offenses. In S. y. Calaza, Postmodernity and European process: opportunity as an informing principle of the judicial process]. Madrid. Dykinson.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/aetpt
Morales Godo, J. (2010). La función del juez en una sociedad democrática. [The role of the judge in a democratic society]. Revista De La Maestría En Derecho Procesal, 4(1). Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/lmxbr
Olano Valderrama, C. (2014). Tratado tècnico-jurìdico sobre accidentes de circulaciòn y materia afines. [Technical-legal treatise on traffic accidents and related matters]. Bogotà: Libreria ediciones del profesional Ltda.
Serrano, M. (2021). El concepto de pena natural (poena naturalis) en la doctrina y la jurisprudencia penal. [The concept of natural penalty (poena naturalis) in criminal doctrine and jurisprudence]. Tesis de Maestria.Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/h9gif
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
