Violation of due process in the fines imposed in the interministerial agreement 00002-2020. Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.2745Keywords:
Administration of justice, international agreement, right to justice, (UNESCO Thesaurus)Abstract
The general objective of the research was to legally analyze the violation of due process in the fines imposed in the inter-ministerial agreement 00002-2020. Ecuador. It was developed from the quantitative approach with a descriptive methodology with non-experimental design, which was supported by documentary-bibliographic analysis. This allowed the review of bibliographic material. In addition, a survey was applied to 145 lawyers of free professional practice, lawyers specialized in constitutional matters, judges specialized in Constitutional Law, who exercise their professional activity in the Canton Latacunga, province of Cotopaxi. It was concluded that any regulatory administrative act that regulates a specific sanctioning procedure must be subject to the legal precepts that regulate the matter, and must respect the constitutional principles related to due process, under penalty of suffering from defects that affect its validity and consequently may be declared null and void.
Downloads
References
Asamblea Nacional (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Comprehensive Criminal Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 180. Recuperado de https://url2.cl/53c6h
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia
Asamblea Nacional República del Ecuador. (2017). Código Orgánico Administrativo. [Organic Administrative Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 31 – Segundo Suplemento. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/tziya
Bechara, A. (2015). El debido proceso: una construcción principialista en la justicia administrativa. [Due process: a principled construction in administrative justice]. En Justicia, 28, 88-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.17081/just.20.28.1040
Celis, R. (2017). ¿Migración o desplazamiento forzado? Las causas de los movimientos de población a debate. [Migration or forced displacement? The causes of population movements under debate]. Bilbao: Deusto.
Cueva Carrión, L. (2016). El Debido Proceso. [Due Process]. Quito. Ediciones Legales.
Ministerio de Gobierno. (2020). Acuerdo Interministerial 00002-2020.[ Interministerial Agreement 00002-2020].Registro Oficial 468. Ministerio de Salud Pública y Ministerio de Gobierno. Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador: IRO. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/3mylk
Ortega Maldonado, J., y García Atra, L. (2018). La presunción de inocencia en el derecho administrativo sancionador mexicano y comparado. [ The presumption of innocence in Mexican and comparative administrative sanctioning law]. Revista de Investigación en Derecho, Criminología y Consultoría DIKE, 11(22), 115-147. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/bvkfy
Presidencia de la República. (2020). Decreto Presidencial 1017. [Presidential Decree 1017]. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/xx68
Zambrano, R. (2018). Los Principios Constitucionales del Debido Proceso y las Garantías Jurisdiccionales. [Constitutional Principles of Due Process and Jurisdictional Guarantees]. Quito: PH Ediciones.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Paulina Jeanneth Zambrano-Andrade, Edison Napoleón Suárez-Merino, José Sebastián Cornejo-Aguiar, Salim Marcelo Zaidan-Albuja
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
