Hydrocarbon offenses and the principle of proportionality in Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.2740Keywords:
Hydrocarbons, legal reform, right to organize, (UNESCO Thesaurus)Abstract
The general objective of the research was to legally analyze discretionality in the application of the right to resistance and the Ecuadorian legal system. The qualitative approach was developed as a method, making use of several bibliographic sources in order to obtain real and updated information to achieve the objective set against the legal problem under analysis. It was based on the analytical-synthetic approach, since with this it was possible to generate a superior knowledge since additional knowledge was added to previous concepts and the inductive method. For the collection of factual data on the problems studied, the interview technique was used in order to obtain relevant information. It is concluded that the principle of proportionality is that principle that has a constitutional rank, whose purpose is to protect the fundamental rights established in the Constitution, in order to avoid the disproportionate and disproportionate use of sanctions.
Downloads
References
Asamblea Nacional (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Comprehensive Criminal Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 180. Recuperado de https://url2.cl/53c6h
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia
Asamblea Nacional. (2019). Ley Orgánica de Garantías Jurisdiccionales y Control Constitucional. [Organic Law of Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control]. Ley 0. Registro Oficial Suplemento 52 de 22-oct-2009 Estado: Vigente. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/su7v
Bedoya, C. A. y Delgado, F. A. (2007). Control de Garantías y Principio de Proporcionalidad en el Proceso Acusatorio. [Control of Guarantees and the Principle of Proportionality in the Accusatory Process]. Bogotá DC. Editorial Dike.
Behar, D. (2008). Metodología de la Investigación. [Research Methodology]. México D.F.: Editorial Shalom.
Bernal Pulido, C. (2013). Tendencias Actuales del Estado Constitucional Contemporáneo. [Current Trends in the Contemporary Constitutional State]. Tomo V. Neoconstitucionalismo y Argumentación Jurídica. Constitucionalismo y Principio de Proporcionalidad. Perú. Ara Editores.
Cadena, R. (2010). Principio de la Prueba en Materia Penal. [ Principle of Evidence in Criminal Matters]. Quito, Ecuador: Ediciones Legales.
Foy Valencia, P., y Valdez Muñoz, W. (2012). Glosario Jurídico Ambiental Peruano, Lima-Perú. [Peruvian Environmental Law Glossary, Lima-Perú]. Editorial Academia de la Magistratura. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/uarim
Pau I Cos, J. (2009). Manual de Logística Integral. [Integrated Logistics Manual Capítulo 9 Almacenes de materia prima. Madrid-España: Editorial Trota.
Robert, A. (2008). El principio de proporcionalidad y la interpretación constitucional. [The principle of proportionality and constitutional interpretation]. 1era Edición. Editorial Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/neuu3
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jessica Magaly Tercero-Tercero , Edison Napoleón Suárez-Merino , José Sebastián Cornejo-Aguiar , Rafael Oyarte-Martínez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
