The presumption of innocence in relation to the exhibition of the apprehended person in the media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2354Keywords:
Justice, right to justice, politics of communication. (UNESCO Thesaurus).Abstract
The general objective of the research was to legally analyze the presumption of innocence in relation to the exhibition of the apprehended person in the media. From the qualitative approach, several bibliographic sources were used in order to obtain real and updated information to achieve the objective set out in relation to the legal problem. The following methods were used: historical - logical since it helped to establish the relationships between the facts that take place in the development of science, analytical - synthetic since it was possible to generate a superior knowledge since additional knowledge was added. In addition, 3 judicial officials were interviewed. It is concluded that, despite the legislative advances in criminal matters in recent years, there are still norms that violate constitutional rights, such as article 529.1 of the Organic Integral Penal Code, where the principle of innocence is violated.
Downloads
References
Asamble General de las Naciones Unidas.(1948).Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos. [Universal Declaration of Human Rights]. Resolución 217 A (III). Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/blszw
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia
Asamblea Nacional República del Ecuador. (2019). Ley Orgánica Reformatoria Al Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Organic Law Reforming the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code]. Suplemento Año I - Nº 107. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/hydc6
Bustamante, M., & Palomo, D. (2018). La presunción de inocencia como regla de juicio y el estándar de prueba de la duda razonable en el proceso penal. Una lectura desde Colombia y Chile.[ The presumption of innocence as a trial rule and the reasonable doubt standard of proof in criminal proceedings. A reading from Colombia and Chile]. Revista Ius et Praxis, 24(3). doi:dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122018000300651
Corte Cosntitucional del Ecuador.(2019). Sentencia N°14-15CN/19. [Ruling N°14-15CN/19]. Consulta de Constitucionalidad de Norma.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/vcueq
Corte Cosntitucional del Ecuador.(2020).Sentencia N° 14-19CN/20. [Ruling No. 14-19CN/20]. CASO No. 14-19-CN.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/5dhc0
López Borja, J. (2014). Tratado de Derecho Procesal Penal. [Treatise on Criminal Procedure Law]. Tomo I (Sexto ed.). Navarra, España: Aranzadi.
Mancilla, R. (2015). El principio de progresividad en el ordenamiento constitucional mexicano.[ The principle of progressivity in Mexican constitutional law]. Revista Cuestiones constitucionales,33;82- 103. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/uri6z
Nieva Fenoll, J. (2018). La razón de ser de la presunción de inocencia. [The rationale for the presumption of innocence]. Revista InDret, 1, 1-23. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/pw5fy
Zaffaroni, E. R. (2014). ¿Derecho penal humano o inhumano?.[ Humane or inhumane criminal law?].Revista Derecho Penal y Criminología(8), 3-15.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/p7vz8
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
