Constitutional rights of children and adolescents under Ecuadorian Humanitarian Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2071Keywords:
Constitutional law, pension, pandemic. (UNESCO Thesaurus).Abstract
The general objective was to legally analyze the constitutional rights of children and adolescents from the Ecuadorian Humanitarian Law. It was developed from a quantitative approach from a descriptive methodology with a non-experimental design, relying on documentary-bibliographic analysis. From laws, norms, magazines; scientific works, thesis, basing the theoretical and legal content, related to the subject treated. In order to complete the argumentation, a survey was applied in which it was sought to identify the opinions and causes for which they have requested the reduction of alimony payments. It is concluded that the approach to alimony is not a sentence dictated under an arbitrary motivation, on the contrary, it is based on a decision made by a judge and that it will be mainly based on constitutional regulations and the strict consideration of the best interest of the child. They shall not be violated.
Downloads
References
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (2020). Ley Orgánica de Apoyo Humanitario. [Organic Law on Humanitarian Support]. Registro Oficial Primer Suplemento No. 229.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/g1tk
Cadenas, O. D., Oliva, B. F., & Pérez, J. P. (2020). Derecho Civil. [Civil Law]. Revistas Extranjeras. Anuario de Derecho Civil, 71(107), 301-340.
Cadme-Orellana, M. V., Narváez-Zurita, C. I., Erazo-Álvarez, J. C., & Vázquez-Calle, J. L. (2020). Violación del principio de proporcionalidad en la fijación de pensiones alimenticias en Ecuador. [Violation of the principle of proportionality in the setting of alimony payments in Ecuador]. Iustitia Socialis. Revista Arbitrada de Ciencias Jurídicas y Criminalísticas, 5(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.35381/racji.v5i2.736
Corte Constitucional. (2012). Sentencia. N°. 048-13-SCN-CC. [Sentence. NO. 048-13-SCN-CC]. Quito. Corte Constitucional: https://n9.cl/b1m9c. Ecuador
Corte Constitucional. (2013). Sentencia. N°.001-13-SNC-CC. [ N°.001-13-SNC-CC]. Quito. Corte Constitucional: https://n9.cl/t4ct. Ecuador.
Ferrajoli, L. (2018). Derecho y Razón. Teoría del garantismo penal. [Law and Reason. Theory of criminal guaranty]. Madrid. Editorial Trotta S.A. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/uvmbr
Igartúa, J. (1998). Discrecionalidad técnica, motivación y control jurisdiccional. [Technical discretion, motivation and jurisdictional control]. Madrid: Civitas S.A.
Palella-Stracuzzi, S. y Martins-Pestana, F. (2012). Metodología de la investigación cuantitativa. [Quantitative research methodology] Fondo editorial de la Universidad Pedagógica Libertador. Caracas, Venezuela.
Soria Mesías, C. y Cáceres Medina, R.(2016). El principio constitucional de proporcionalidad y las pensiones adicionales de alimentos. [ The constitutional principle of proportionality and the additional alimony payments]. Tesis de Maestría. UNIANDES. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/1p6o5h
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
