Detention for investigative purposes and its impact on the principle of presumption of innocence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2059Keywords:
Right to justice, legal theory, constitution. (UNESCO Thesaurus).Abstract
The general objective of the research was to legally analyze detention for investigative purposes and its impact on the principle of presumption of innocence. The methodology was developed from the qualitative approach, using several bibliographic sources in order to obtain real and updated information to achieve the objective set against the legal problem under analysis, contrasting the information with the opinion of the jurists interviewed. In addition, bibliographic material, books, magazine articles, regulations and laws were analyzed, thus producing contributions to the law in the institution of due process in the guarantee of duty. It is concluded that article 530 of the Organic Integral Penal Code, which regulates detention for investigative purposes, is unconstitutional because it violates the principle of presumption of innocence, since detention is justified only in cases of a fair trial for the commission of a criminal offenseDownloads
References
Asamblea Nacional (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Comprehensive Criminal Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 180. Recuperado de https://url2.cl/53c6h
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. Recuperado de https://n9.cl/sia
Baculima, G., Narvaez, C., Trelles, D., & Erazo, J. (2020). Derecho a la defensa en la detención con fines investigativos. Revista Iustitia Socialis, 5(8), 41-63. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/v0g1t
Becaria, C. (2015). Tratado de los delitos y de las penas. [Treatise on crimes and penalties]. Universidad Carlos III dE Madrid. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/n6891
Corte Nacional de Justicia. (2019). Presidencia de la Corte Nacional de Justicia Absolución de Consultas Criterio no Vinculante. [ Presidency of the National Court of Justice Absolution of Consultations Non-Binding Criteria]. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/cbv3g
Ferrajoli, L. (2015). Derechos Fundametales. Italia. Mondo.
Gutiérrez, H., Cantos, R., & Duran, A. (2019). Vulneración del debido proceso en el procedimiento penal abreviado. [ Infringement of due process in abbreviated criminal procedure]. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 11(4), 52-57. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/wj61l
López, Y. (2021). Los juicios de Núremberg. Análisis de su enfoque a la culpabilidad. [The Nuremberg Trials. Analysis of their approach to guilt]. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 13(2), 112-128.Recuperaddo de: https://n9.cl/6naok
Montero, D., y Salazar, A. (2019). Derecho de defensa en la jurisprudencia. [Right of defense in jurisprudence]. Revista Jurídica Latinoamericana, 4(1), 58-65. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/r32676.pdf
Sanchez, J. (2018). Detención con fines investigativos y vulneración del derecho constitucional al debido proceso. [Detention for investigative purposes and violation of constitutional due process rights] Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/zb6ea
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
