Importance of pelvimetry in pregnant women and dystocic risk factor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v8i2.4116Keywords:
Pelvimetry, dystocia, risk assessment, (Source: DeCS)Abstract
Objective: To analyze the importance of pelvimetry in pregnant women and dystocic risk factor. Method: Descriptive documentary. Conclusion: Pelvimetry is a diagnostic tool of inestimable value in the evaluation of the risk of dystocia in pregnant women, providing crucial data which, integrated in a thorough clinical evaluation, allow highly informed decisions to be made regarding the safest and most appropriate mode of delivery. Although advanced imaging techniques, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, have increased the accuracy and reliability of pelvic measurements, their clinical application must be framed within a multidimensional approach that takes into account other critical factors, such as fetal macrosomia and the evolutionary particularities of human pelvic morphology.
Downloads
References
Nishikawa S, Miki M, Chigusa Y, et al. Obstetric pelvimetry by three-dimensional computed tomography in non-pregnant Japanese women: a retrospective single-center study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023;36(1):2190444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2023.2190444
Hong JS, Brown KGM, Waller J, Young CJ, Solomon MJ. The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(10):991-1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02274-x
Pattinson RC. Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000161
Pattinson RC, Cuthbert A, Vannevel V. Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at or near term for deciding on mode of delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3(3):CD000161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000161.pub2
Tresch C, Lallemant M, Nallet C, et al. Updating of pelvimetry standards in modern obstetrics. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):3080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53603-1
de Azevedo BLR, Roni GM, Torrelio RMF, da Gama-de-Souza LN. Fibrosis as a Risk Factor for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Systematic Review. J Pediatr Genet. 2023;12(2):97-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1763257
Hou PC, Del Agua N, Lwin SM, Hsu CK, McGrath JA. Innovations in the Treatment of Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (DEB): Current Landscape and Prospects. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023;19:455-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S386923
Brett BL, Gardner RC, Godbout J, Dams-O'Connor K, Keene CD. Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Neurodegenerative Disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 1;91(5):498-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.05.025
Nguyen MT, Ouzounian JG. Evaluation and Management of Fetal Macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021;48(2):387-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2021.02.008
Pavličev M, Romero R, Mitteroecker P. Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(1):3-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.043
Hankins GD, Clark SM, Munn MB. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(5):276-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009
Sentilhes L, Sénat MV, Boulogne AI, et al. Shoulder dystocia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;203:156-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.047
Schmitz T. Modalités de l'accouchement dans la prévention de la dystocie des épaules en cas de facteurs de risque identifiés [Delivery management for the prevention of shoulder dystocia in case of identified risk factors]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015;44(10):1261-1271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.051
Pavličev M, Romero R, Mitteroecker P. Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(1):3-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.043
Dumont A, de Loenzien M, Nhu HMQ, et al. Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2(11):e0001264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001264
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shirley Marjorie Quispe-Campoverde, Daniela Margarita Mendoza-Morales, Jennifer Lissette Criollo-Landa, Ruth Alexandra Ramos-Villacís
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/saludyvida/oai.
