Functional and mechanical orthopedic treatment for the correction of skeletal class II
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v6i1.1739Keywords:
Dental caries activity tests, tooth preparation, dental care. (Source, DeCS).Abstract
Objective: To analyze the different treatment alternatives based on Functional and Mechanical Orthopedics, their effect at skeletal level, their benefits. Method: Bibliographic review. Results: 15 articles were selected from a universe of 45, as they were those directly related to the research topic. Conclusions: We have been able to identify the different treatment alternatives with functional or mechanical orthopedics that can be used for the treatment of skeletal Class II, corroborated with results that show their effectiveness in craniofacial, soft tissue and dental changes obtained at the end of the therapy, the authors recommend the correct evaluation of the patients before determining the appliances to be used, as well as taking advantage of the early stages of maturation and growth so that the changes in the skeletal pattern are more representative, effective and achieve the objective of improving the maxillomandibular relationship.
Downloads
References
Fregoso C, Villa Y. Ortopedia híbrida. Informe de un caso [Hybrid orthopedics. Case report]. Revista Odontológica Mexicana. 2009 Marzo; 13(1): p. 53-55.
Güler ÖÇ, Malkoç S. Comparison of facial soft tissue changes after treatment with 3 different functional appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;158(4):518-526. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.06.020
Parekh J, Counihan K, Fleming PS, Pandis N, Sharma PK. Effectiveness of part-time vs full-time wear protocols of Twin-block appliance on dental and skeletal changes: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155(2):165-172. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.07.016
Tomblyn T, Rogers M, Andrews L 2nd, et al. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150(5):818-830. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.020
VanLaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(5):582-593. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.030
Wigal TG, Dischinger T, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, Ngan P. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(2):210-223. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.036
Hernández Silva JA, Rodríguez Manjarrés C, Molina Betancourt N. Cambios cefalométricos obtenidos con activador abierto elástico de Klammt como tratamiento temprano de maloclusión clase II. Rev. nac. odontol. [Internet];13(25). Disponible en: https://revistas.ucc.edu.co/index.php/od/article/view/1704
Herrero Solano Yosvany, Viltres Pedraza Guadalupe Rita, León Aragoneses Zulema, Saumel Naranjo Yaneisy, Pérez Espinoza Milagros Ramona. Tratamiento de la clase II división 1 con el activador abierto elástico de Klammt [Treatment of class II division 1 with the elastic open activator of Klammt]. Multimed [Internet]. 2019; 23(1): 91-103.
Fernández-Ysla R, Pérez-López M, Otaño-Laffitte G, Delgado-Carrera L. Cambios faciales y de tejidos blandos en pacientes con síndrome de clase II división 1 tratados con bloques gemelos [Facial and soft tissue changes in patients with class II division 1 syndrome treated with twin blocks.]. Rev Cubana Estomatol [Internet]. 2005; 42 (2): [aprox. 5 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revestomatologia.sld.cu/index.php/est/article/view/2452
Kannan S, Saravanan S, Arora N, Singh AK, Malhotra A, Bhatia M. Treatment of Class II Division 2 Pattern Malocclusion Using Protraction Utility Arch in a Prepubertal Patient: A Clinical Case Report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13(4):416-420. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1753
Garg H, Khatria H, Kaldhari K, Singh K, Purwar P, Rukshana R. Intermolar and Intercanine width Changes among Class I and Class II Malocclusions Following Orthodontic Treatment. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S4-S9. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2049
Singh S, Saraf BG, Indushekhar KR, Sheoran N. Estimation of the Intercanine Width, Intermolar Width, Arch Length, and Arch Perimeter and Its Comparison in 12-17-year-old Children of Faridabad. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(3):369-375. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1957
D'Souza IM, Kumar HC, Shetty KS. Dental arch changes associated with rapid maxillary expansion: A retrospective model analysis study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6(1):51-57. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.149292
Alves ACM, Janson G, Mcnamara JA Jr, Lauris JRP, Garib DG. Maxillary expander with differential opening vs Hyrax expander: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157(1):7-18. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.07.010
Liu J, Liao W, Zhao Z. Rapid maxillary expansion, with traditional or novel expander?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157(6):734. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.03.007
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/saludyvida/oai.
