The functionality of organized apparatuses of power in the crime of illicit association. Case: Odebrecht

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.3345

Keywords:

Criminal penalty, criminal law, corruption, (UNESCO Thesaurus)

Abstract

The general objective of this study was to legally analyze the functionality of organized apparatuses of power in the crime of illicit association. Case: Odebrecht. This research used the quantitative method, based on a documentary-bibliographic review. In addition, the inductive-deductive method was applied. The analytical-synthetic method was also used. It can be concluded that the crime of association to commit a crime was configured in the present case in the fact that the sentenced officials united around a common purpose of allowing the company  to negotiate with them in order to achieve the alteration or modification of each one of the contract specifications, and in this way be able to achieve that the company could obtain the best scores to obtain the construction of certain works.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aboso, G. (2017). Cibercriminalidad y Derecho Penal. [Cybercrime and Criminal Law]. Buenos Aires: B de F.

Asamblea Nacional (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Comprehensive Criminal Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 180. https://url2.cl/53c6h

Dávila Newman, G. (2006). El razonamiento inductivo y deductivo dentro del proceso investigativo en ciencias experimentales y sociales. [Inductive and deductive reasoning within the research process in experimental and social sciences]. Laurus, 12(Ext), 180-205. https://n9.cl/nx847

Donna, A. (2018). Derecho Penal Especial. [Special Criminal Law]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Rubinzal Editores.

Durand, F. (2019). La empresa que capturaba gobiernos. [The company that captured governments]. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú y Oxfam.

Gil, A. (2008). La autoría mediata por aparatos jerarquizados. [Authorship-by-means by hierarchical devices]. https://n9.cl/wchz9

Lamarca, C. (2017). Delitos, la parte especial del derecho penal. [Crimes, the special part of criminal law]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: De Palma.

Mikkelsen, J. (2017). Asociación ilícita. [Unlawful association]. México: La Ley.

ONU. (2000). Convención de las Naciones Unidas contra la Delincuencia Organizada Transnacional. [United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime]. New York: ONU.

Rodríguez, A., y Pérez, A. O. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. [Scientific methods of inquiry and knowledge construction]. Revista EAN, 82, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647

Roxin, C. (2000). Autoría y dominio del hecho en Derecho Penal. [Perpetrators and dominion of the act in Criminal Law]. Madrid, España: Ediciones Jurídicas y Sociales.

Sánchez de García, P. (2001). Función político-criminal del delito de asociación para delinquir: desde el derecho penal político hasta la lucha contra el crimen organizado. [Political-criminal function of the crime of criminal association: from political criminal law to the fight against organized crime]. Universidad de Salamanca, 2, 645-681. https://n9.cl/z67tca

Ziffer, P. (2016). El delito de asociación ilícita. [The crime of illicit association]. Madrid: Adhoc.

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Toaza-Ledesma , A. R., Cornejo-Aguiar , J. S., Carrera-Calderón , F. A., & Zárate-Barreiro, M. (2023). The functionality of organized apparatuses of power in the crime of illicit association. Case: Odebrecht. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 8(1), 1630–1641. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.3345

Issue

Section

De Investigación

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >>