Regulatory deficiencies in the control power of the superintendency of popular and solidarity economy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.2963

Keywords:

Collective economy, cooperative, control of the accounts, (UNESCO Thesaurus)

Abstract

The general objective of the research was to legally analyze the normative deficiencies in the control power of the Superintendence of Popular and Solidarity Economy. The present research used the quantitative method which produces descriptive data, originating from data collection. In addition, the inductive-deductive method is applied. The analytical-synthetic method is also used, by means of which a whole is broken down into parts, extracting qualities, components and relationships. The use of these methods made it possible to analyze doctrine, normative bodies, legal documents, theses and bibliography. The survey applied to legal experts, who are openly knowledgeable about the subject in question, was also used. It is concluded that most savings and credit cooperatives and credit institutions do not fully comply with the regulations issued by the SEPS, which results in disadvantages for the cooperative sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asamblea Nacional. (2018). Ley Orgánica de Economía Popular y Solidaria. [Organic Law of Popular and Solidarity Economy]. Quito: Registro Oficial 444 de 10-may.-2011 Última modificación: 23-oct.-2018. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/73op2g

Benalcazar, J. (2017). Derecho procesal Administrativo ecuatoriano. Jurisprudencia, Dogmática y Doctrina. [Ecuadorian Administrative Procedural Law. Jurisprudence, Dogmatic and Doctrine]. FORO revista de derecho, 8, 1-18. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/0e6b3

Castañeda, P., & Secaira. (19 de junio de 2018). Características de la Potestad. [Characteristics of the Power]. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/nfsvc

Castro Medina, A. (2018). Economía popular y solidaria: ¿realidad o utopía? Caracterización de las entidades de fomento. [Popular and solidarity economy: reality or utopia? Characterization of development entities]. Quito: Editorial Abya-Yala, 220 p. https://doi.org/10.7476/9789978104903.

Dávila Newman, G. (2006). El razonamiento inductivo y deductivo dentro del proceso investigativo en ciencias experimentales y sociales. [Inductive and deductive reasoning within the research process in experimental and social sciences]. Laurus, 12(Ext),180-205. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/nx847

Dromi, R. (2016). Derecho Administrativo. [Administrative Law]. Buenos Aires: Ed.

Ivanega, M. (2018). Reflexiones Acerca del Derecho Administrativo y el Régimen Exorbitante de Derecho Privado. [Reflections on Administrative Law and the Exorbitant Private Law Regime]. Revista de Administración Pública, 323, 1-17. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/x6il0

Naula González, J., Narváez Zurita, C., Vázquez Calle, J., & Erazo Álvarez, J. (2020). La acción de protección: el daño grave entre particulares. [The action for protection: serious damage between private individuals]. Iustitia Socialis, 422. http://dx.doi.org/10.35381/racji.v5i8.583

Oyarte, R. (2016). Derecho Constitucional Ecuatoriano y Comparado. [Ecuadorian and Comparative Constitutional Law]. Quito: Corporación de Estudios y Publicaciones.

Rivero, R. y Granda V. (2017) Derecho Administrativo [Administrative Law]. Editorial Nacional. Edición primera. Quito.

Rodríguez, A. y Pérez, A. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. [Scientific methods of inquiry and knowledge construction]. Revista EAN, 82, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647

Published

2023-05-01

How to Cite

Acosta-Bombón, J. L., Vaca-Acosta , P. M., Castro-Sánchez , F.-D.-J., & Jordán-Naranjo , G. V. (2023). Regulatory deficiencies in the control power of the superintendency of popular and solidarity economy. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 8(1), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.2963

Issue

Section

De Investigación

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>