Effective cooperation agreements in the light of the principles of timeliness and proportionality in criminal matters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.3282Keywords:
Legislation, civil rights, legal principle, (UNESCO Thesaurus)Abstract
The general objective of the research was to legally analyze the effective cooperation agreement in view of the principles of opportunity and proportionality in criminal matters. The method used in the research was based on the qualitative approach, handling the collection and analysis of a documentary-bibliographic typology. The research technique applied was the interview, which was applied to five lawyers with academic training in criminal law and more than two years of experience in the exercise of their functions. An analytical-reflexive process was generated. It is concluded that there are not enough doctrinal or legal foundations with which a judge can duly motivate the acceptance of an Effective Cooperation Agreement and his or her broad discretion to interpret the qualifiers established in the norm to validate "the effectiveness of the information" provided by the defendant, may jeopardize the success of the investigation and also the freedom of a person.
Downloads
References
Asamblea Nacional (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Comprehensive Criminal Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 180. https://url2.cl/53c6h
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. https://n9.cl/sia
Behar Rivero, D. (2018). Metodología de la Investigación. [Investigation methodology]. https://n9.cl/k9q2
Bobbio, N. (2000). Teoría General del Derecho. [General Theory of Law]. Bogotá. Temis. https://n9.cl/b4egm
Calvo, R. (2007). La ineficacia de las normas jurídicas en la teoría pura del derecho. [The ineffectiveness of legal norms in pure legal theory]. ISONOMÍA, 27, 171-191. https://n9.cl/pdv6x
Díaz, T. (2011). Validez del Derecho: análisis conceptual a partir de los modelos teóricos de Kelsen y Alexy. [Validity of Law: conceptual analysis based on the theoretical models of Kelsen and Alexy]. Revista Jurídica Mario Alario D´Filippo, 105-111. https://n9.cl/n8b36
Franceschetti, G. (2022). Doctrina: El colaborador. [Doctrine: The collaborator]. https://n9.cl/jnev0
Guamán, K. H. (2020). El positivismo y el positivismo jurídico. [Positivism and legal positivism]. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 12(4), 265-269. https://n9.cl/ge2yz
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., y Baptista, M. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. [Investigation Methodology]. (5ta ed.). México: McGraw-Hill.
Leiva, E. A. (2011). Eficacia jurídica y sociológica de los derechos fundamentales de las trabajadoras sexuales en Colombia. [Legal and sociological effectiveness of the fundamental rights of sex workers in Colombia]. Nova et Vetera, 20(64), 29-42. https://n9.cl/3ocnn
Mendieta, L. Y. (2011). A ineficácia das normas jurídicas na teoria pura do direito. [The ineffectiveness of legal norms in the pure theory of law]. Revista Derecho y Realidad,18, 235-245. https://n9.cl/3ux7r
Tantaleán Odar, R. (2016). Tipología de las investigaciones jurídicas. [Typology of legal research]. Derecho y Cambio Social, 13(43), 1-37. https://n9.cl/1avad
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Franklin Paúl Altamirano-Sánchez , José Sebastián Cornejo-Aguiar , Ariel José Romero-Fernández , Genaro Vinicio Jordán-Naranjo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
