Ex officio evidence is called evidence to better resolve on the basis of the principle of impartiality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2011

Keywords:

Impartiality, due process, constitutional law, constitutional law. (UNESCO Thesaurus).

Abstract

The general objective of the research was to legally analyze the ex officio evidence called evidence to better resolve based on the principle of impartiality. The research path was followed under the quantitative approach, by means of inquiry, collection and critical analysis through a documentary, bibliographic and statistical typology. A bibliographic design of documentary type, which seeks reflection and critical analysis, and to build related methods of discernment of the phenomenon and thus evaluate or consider new contexts. In addition, a survey was applied to a sample of 166 lawyers out of a total population of 967, enrolled in the Bar Association. It is concluded, the principle of equity is a decisive adjustment of obligation to provide to the judges who have to their recrimination the practice of the jurisdictional office, which consists of the responsibility that they have to be alien or strange to the assets of the parties of the controversy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abad,I., Camacho, J., Capelo, G., Chiliquinga, D., Olalla, S. (2017) La imparcialidad judicial. [The Judicial Impartiality]. Revista Jurídica 31;141-152.Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/53hms

Arias, F. (2006). El Proyecto de Investigación. Introducción a la metodología científica. [The Research Project. Introduction to scientific methodology]. (5ª edición). Editorial Episteme. Caracas. Venezuela

Asamblea Nacional de la República del Ecuador. (2015) Código orgánico general de procesos. [General Organic Code of Processes]. 2 - Suplemento - Registro Oficial Nº 506 - viernes 22 de mayo de 2015. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/z8haz

Carnelutti, F. (2018). La prueba civil. [ Civil evidence]. Chile: Editorial Jurídicas Olejnik.

Echandía, H. (2015). Teoría General de la Prueba Judicial. [General Theory of Judicial Evidence]. Tomo I. Buenos Aires. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/25uk46

Izurieta Alaña, L. G. (2018). Imparcialidad y prueba para mejor resolver en el Código Orgánico General de Procesos del Ecuador: Especial referencia al procedimiento contencioso tributario ecuatoriano. [ Impartiality and evidence for a better resolution in the General Organic Code of Proceedings of Ecuador: Special reference to the Ecuadorian tax litigation procedure]. Revista Jurídica Piélagus, 17(2), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.25054/16576799.1928

Palella, S. y Martins, F. (2012). Metodología de la Investigación Cuantitativa. [Quantitative Research Methodology]. Fondo Editorial de la Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador. Caracas. Venezuela

Salas Villalobos, S. (2021) La valoración probatoria y la prueba de oficio como aproximación a la gnoseología inductiva en el proceso civil. [Evidentiary assessment and ex officio evidence as an approach to inductive gnoseology in the civil process]. Ius et Praxis, Revista de la Facultad de Derecho,52;231-257. https://doi.org/10.26439/iusetpraxis2021.n052.5220

Valverde, L. (2016). La motivación y la prueba de oficio: racionalidad de la iniciativa probatoria del juez. [Motivation and ex officio evidence: rationality of the judge's evidentiary initiative]. Revista de la Maestría en Derecho Procesal, 6(1);58-92. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/0a7zj

Villabella, C. (2015) Los métodos en la investigación jurídica. Algunas precisiones. [Methods in legal research. Some clarifications] Instituto de Investigación Jurídica de la UNAM. Recuperado de: https://n9.cl/ylxad

Published

2022-11-26

How to Cite

Chasiquiza-Toaquiza, J. O., Machado-Rojas, J. E., & Mosquera-Endara, M.-D.-R. (2022). Ex officio evidence is called evidence to better resolve on the basis of the principle of impartiality. IUSTITIA SOCIALIS, 7(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v7i2.2011

Issue

Section

De Investigación

Most read articles by the same author(s)