Cross-death and hyper-presidentialism in the Ecuadorian state
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v9i1.3670Keywords:
Cross-death, hiper-presidentialism, State, (UNESCO Thesaurus)Abstract
The general objective of the research was to legally analyze cross-death and hyper-presidentialism in the Ecuadorian state. This research used the quantitative method, which produces descriptive data, originating from data collection. Supported by the documentary-bibliographic review. In addition, the inductive-deductive method was used. The analytical-synthetic method was also used. The technique used to gather information on the problem described is the survey, through the application of a questionnaire to a sample of 50 professionals (lawyers, judges, law students and university professors) knowledgeable in law. It is concluded that the death cross is the power of a dissolutionary power that can be moved by the president of the republic, as well as by the national assembly on the basis of what is stated in the Constitution, given that it is the first case in the country that has been executed.
Downloads
References
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente (1998). Constitución Política de la República del Ecuador. [Political Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. https://n9.cl/2dh3x
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. https://n9.cl/i1ch
Banegas Cedillo, M. (2014). La Muerte Cruzada en el nuevo texto constitucional: relaciones Ejecutivo-Legislativo. [Cross-Death in the new constitutional text: Executive-Legislative relations]. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. https://n9.cl/9kbzu3
Corte Constitucional del Ecuador (2010). Sentencia N.º 002-10-SIC-CC. [Ruling N.º 002-10-SIC-CC]. https://n9.cl/8mlo2
Dávila Newman, G. (2006). El razonamiento inductivo y deductivo dentro del proceso investigativo en ciencias experimentales y sociales. [Inductive and deductive reasoning within the research process in experimental and social sciences]. Laurus, 12(Ext), 180-205. https://n9.cl/nx847
Flores Orellana, M. (2023). La muerte cruzada en el constitucionalismo ecuatoriano ¿Hay que mantenerla? [The cross death in Ecuadorian constitutionalism: should it be maintained?]. Tesis de Pregrado. Universidad del Azuay. https://n9.cl/b0tbp
Ordoñez, I. A. (2017). El hiperpresidencialismo en el Ecuador. [Hyper-presidentialism in Ecuador]. Tesis de Pregrado. Universidad de las Américas. https://n9.cl/w7glw8
Orna, G. M. (2023). La inestabilidad hispanoamericana: la muerte cruzada en Ecuador. [Spanish-American instability: the death cross in Ecuador]. https://n9.cl/bm1qg
Rodríguez, A., y Pérez, A. O. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. [Scientific methods of inquiry and knowledge construction]. Revista EAN, 82, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647
Sartori, G. (1994). Comparative Constitutional Engineering. London: MacMillan.
Villacreses Brito, G. (2023). Primera Muerte Cruzada en Ecuador, ¿(Des)Equilibrio de Poderes? [First Cross-Death in Ecuador, (Un)Balance of Power?]. USFQ Law Working Papers. https://n9.cl/gfq8e5
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Juan Giovani Sailema-Armijo, Joyce Nicole Quinche-Sarango, Angie Nicolle Cepeda-Párraga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
