Criminal Dosimetry: Regulatory arbitrariness and practice in Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35381/racji.v8i1.3304Keywords:
Justice, criminal law, legal theory, (UNESCO Thesaurus)Abstract
The general objective of the research was to legally analyze criminal dosimetry: normative arbitrariness and practice in Ecuador. The quantitative method was used, which produces descriptive data, originating from data collection. It was supported by the documentary-bibliographic review. In addition, the inductive-deductive method was applied. The analytical-synthetic method was also used. A survey was applied to 27 law professionals working in the Criminal Judicial Unit and Criminal Guarantees Court of Latacunga canton. It is concluded that the COIP shows that there are shortcomings at the time of the legislative debate for the approval of laws and that, in the country there is a politicized justice, to typify the minimum and maximum penalties within this legislation, so it is recommended to make reforms, so that those involved are punished according to the
Downloads
References
Asamblea Nacional (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. [Comprehensive Criminal Code]. Registro Oficial Nº 180. https://url2.cl/53c6h
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente de la República del Ecuador, (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Montecristi. Registro Oficial 449 de 20-oct-2008. https://n9.cl/sia
Bermeo Arcos, P. (2019). Dosimetría penal: la arbitrariedad normativa y práctica. [Criminal dosimetry: regulatory and practical arbitrariness]. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar. https://n9.cl/kiaou
Cornejo, J. (2017). La proporcionalidad o dosimetría de las penas. [Proportionality or dosimetry of penalties]. https://n9.cl/m4pk2
Dávila Newman, G. (2006). El razonamiento inductivo y deductivo dentro del proceso investigativo en ciencias experimentales y sociales. [Inductive and deductive reasoning within the research process in experimental and social sciences]. Laurus, 12(Ext), 180-205. https://n9.cl/nx847
Goh, J. (2013). Proporcionality. An Unattainable Ideal in the Criminal Justice System. https://n9.cl/tzkba
Pulluguari, K. (2018). Politización mediática de la justicia en Ecuador. Estudio de caso: Ecuavisa. [Media politicization of justice in Ecuador. Case study: Ecuavisa]. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Internacional de Analucía. https://n9.cl/t7lqy
Rodríguez, A., y Pérez, A. O. (2017). Métodos científicos de indagación y de construcción del conocimiento. [Scientific methods of inquiry and knowledge construction]. Revista EAN, 82, 179-200. https://doi.org/10.21158/01208160.n82.2017.1647
Rojas, I. (2017). La proporcionalidad en las penas. [Proportionality in penalties]. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM. https://n9.cl/4omo0
Zambrano Castro, R. (2020). Vulneración en el acceso al régimen semiabierto de las personas condenadas por delito de asesinato en Santo Domingo. [Violation of access to semi-open regime for persons convicted of murder in Santo Domingo]. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Regional Autónoma de los Andes. https://n9.cl/cu0oy
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Domitila Elizabeth Gutiérrez-Ataballo, Diego Francisco Granja-Zurita , Jesús Estupiñan-Ricardo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CC BY-NC-SA : Esta licencia permite a los reutilizadores distribuir, remezclar, adaptar y construir sobre el material en cualquier medio o formato solo con fines no comerciales, y solo siempre y cuando se dé la atribución al creador. Si remezcla, adapta o construye sobre el material, debe licenciar el material modificado bajo términos idénticos.
OAI-PMH URL: https://fundacionkoinonia.com.ve/ojs/index.php/Iustitia_Socialis/oai
