Anterosuperior retraction distance through nickel-titanium alloy and steel helical loops

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v9i1.4506

Keywords:

Orthodontics, dental arch, dental models, alloys, (Source: DeCS).

Abstract

Objective: To compare the upper anterior retraction distance through helical loops made of nickel-titanium alloy and stainless steel. Method: The helical loops were made of nickel-titanium alloy and steel of caliber 0.017” x 0.025”, MBT brackets and molar tubes slot 0.22”. The typodonts were scanned before and after the procedure, the closure and inclination were measured in the pieces adjacent to the space, the Wilcoxon rank test was applied with a significance level of 95%. Results: Differences were evident in the comparison made between T1 and T2, in the loop made of steel the average closure was greater than in the case of NiTi, however, the steel loop produces more changes in the angulation of the canines. Conclusion: The findings suggest that both materials are clinically useful, although steel could be preferred in cases that require greater efficacy in space closure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Techalertpaisarn P, Versluis A. Mechanical properties of Opus closing loops, L-loops, and T-loops investigated with finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(5):675-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.011

Kauling Bisol G, Rocha R. Estudo laboratorial do tempo de fechamento das alças e do grau de inclinação do canino, durante o procedimento de retração, empregando mecânica de arco segmentado. Dental Press J Orthod. 2010;15(1):53-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s2176-94512010000100007

Faulkner M, Lipsett A, EI-Rayes K, Haberstock D, Edmonton M. On the use of vertical loops in retraction systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;99(4):28-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70015-O

Rose D, Quick A, Swain M, Herbison P. Moment-to-force characteristics of preactivated nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum alloy symmetrical T-loops. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(6):757-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.015

Chacko A, Tikku T, Khanna R, Maurya RP, Srivastava K. Comparative assessment of the efficacy of closed helical loop and T-loop for space closure in lingual orthodontics—a finite element study. Prog Orthod. 2018;19(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/27705781.2022.2053388

Kum M, Quick A, Hood JA, Herbison P. Moment to force ratio characteristics of three Japanese NiTi and TMA dosing loops. Aust Orthod J. 2004;20(2):107-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.015

Hung BQ, Hong M, Yu W, Kyung HM. Comparison of inclination and vertical changes between single-wire and double-wire retraction techniques in lingual orthodontics. Korean J Orthod. 2020;50(1):26-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2020.50.1.26

Keng FY, Quick AN, Swain MV, Herbison P. A comparison of space closure rates between preactivated nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum alloy T-loops: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(1):33-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq156

Bilinska M, Dalstra M. The effect of symmetric and asymmetric loading of frontal segment with two curved cantilevers: An in vitro study. Dent J. 2022;10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10040052

Ruenpol N, Sucharitpwatskul S, Wattanawongskun P, Charoenworaluck N. Force direction using miniscrews in sliding mechanics differentially affected maxillary central incisor retraction: Finite element simulation and typodont model. J Dent Sci. 2019 Jun 1;14(2):138-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2019.01.016

Dalessandri D, Lazzaroni E, Migliorati M, Piancino MG, Tonni I, Bonetti S. Self-ligating fully customized lingual appliance and chair-time reduction: A typodont study followed by a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2013;35(6):758-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq156

Ishida Y, Kuwajima Y, Lee C, Ogawa K, Da Silva JD, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Effect of magnet position on tipping and bodily tooth movement in magnetic force-driven orthodontics. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(16). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13163588

Alkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Abu Alhaija E. Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(6):771-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.026

Murugesan A, Navaneethan R. Comparing the efficacy of Specs Loop and T Loop for en masse anterior retraction: A finite element study. Clin Investig Orthod. 2022;81(2):93-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/27705781.2022.2053388

Chun YS, Rhee JN, Row J. A comparison between friction and frictionless mechanics with a new typodont simulation system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119(3):292-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.112452

Chiu A, Chen YW, Hayashi J, Sadr A. Accuracy of CAD/CAM digital impressions with different intraoral scanner parameters. Sensors (Switzerland). 2020;20(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13163588

Published

2025-04-01

How to Cite

Gutiérrez-López, M. A., Guerrero-Alvarado, D. E., & Lima-Illescas, M. V. (2025). Anterosuperior retraction distance through nickel-titanium alloy and steel helical loops. Revista Arbitrada Interdisciplinaria De Ciencias De La Salud. Salud Y Vida, 9(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.35381/s.v.v9i1.4506